🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a direct warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on reports in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that when you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."