🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a lower court's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the maps created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A top Democratic figure stated the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.